Historical revision — this record as it stood on 6 September 2026, not the current version. View the current record →

Principal alignment and fee preservation

The Principal Alignment and Fee Preservation model describes how compensation in the Direct-Hold Solutions is structured to enforce a direct alignment between the developer's economic interest and the investment returns of the investors it serves. The conventional alternative investment fee model — the 2/20 structure of a 2% annual management fee and 20% carried interest — is restructured in two ways. Developer profit is taken as equity rather than cash, and the variable management fee is replaced by a fixed annual overhead contribution that does not grow with the passage of time or the execution of transactions. Only one Direct-Hold Solution is currently established, and no offering of its units has closed; the model described here is the compensation structure intended to apply as each vehicle is funded.

The problem with the conventional 2/20 model

In the conventional 2/20 real estate fund structure, the manager receives two streams of compensation that are structurally decoupled from investor outcomes. The annual management fee — typically 1% to 2% of assets under management — is earned regardless of investment performance. The carried interest — typically 15% to 20% of profits above a hurdle rate — is earned only on profitable outcomes, but is cash-settled as profit distributions are made, meaning the manager extracts cash from the vehicle as returns are generated.

Manager income decoupled from investor outcomes

The result is a fee structure in which the manager's income is partially independent of investor returns (the management fee component) and partially correlated with them (the carried interest component), but in which the developer's own capital is not at risk in the vehicle in the same way that investor capital is. The manager can receive management fees from a fund that ultimately underperforms its hurdle rate.

Equity-based compensation

In the Direct-Hold Solutions, Woodfine is not to receive cash management fees based on assets under management. Developer compensation is intended to be taken as Equity-Based Compensation: Investment Units in the vehicle, issued in lieu of cash carried interest. Those units are to be held in trust until investors' initial capital has been fully returned. Issuance is contingent on the closing of an offering of units, which has not yet occurred.

The consequence of this structure is a 1:1 alignment between the developer and the investors at the level of the vehicle's equity. The developer's economic profit is designed as an ownership stake in the same asset that investors hold — subject to the same market conditions, income performance, and distribution timing — rather than a cash extraction from the vehicle's income stream. Until the investors who contributed the initial equity capital have received that capital back in full, the developer's units are to remain in trust and are not to participate in distributions. In the established Canada vehicle, this is the escrow mechanism described in Professional Centres Canada LP's structure article: the promoter's minority equity interest is held in escrow through a special-purpose subsidiary, with voting rights retained but the units not freely disposable until that same capital-recovery condition is met. The developer's compensation is intended to be contingent on the same outcome that investors are seeking.

Retained Equity as structural reserve

The developer's equity position, once earned through the holding period and investor capital return, is intended to become Retained Equity on the vehicle's balance sheet. Retained Equity is designed to function as a structural reserve: permanent capital that does not require distribution, reducing the vehicle's future need to raise external equity for new construction phases. The compounding of Retained Equity over the vehicle's holding period is the mechanism by which the Narrow Bank Financial Model is intended to produce a materially larger total asset base on the same initial equity capital than legacy alternatives.

Initial offering cost reimbursement

Separate from the ongoing overhead contribution, Woodfine pays all costs and expenses of each offering of units. In the established Canada vehicle, the partnership's governing agreement provides for reimbursement to Woodfine of 1% of the gross proceeds from the sale of units in an offering, as partial payment of those offering costs. It is a one-time reimbursement tied to a specific offering, not a recurring management fee.

The fixed annual overhead contribution

Variable management fees — acquisition fees, asset management fees, disposition fees, financing fees — are replaced by a single fixed annual overhead contribution calculated on the Gross Funded Value of each Direct-Hold Solution. The contribution is paid to Woodfine Advisors Inc., the retained advisor, under the advisory services agreement, calculated as a fixed percentage of the stated gross funded value of the vehicle rather than as a mark-to-market percentage of net asset value.

Fee predictability and valuation independence

This structure eliminates several characteristics of the conventional management fee that create misalignment between manager incentives and investor interests. First, the fee does not grow as the vehicle's assets appreciate — a vehicle whose net asset value doubles does not produce double the management fee. Second, the fee is predictable at the time of investment: the investor can calculate the total management overhead cost for the full holding period at inception. Third, the fee is not subject to manipulation through asset valuation — since the fee is calculated on the Gross Funded Value rather than a marked net asset value, there is no incentive to inflate reported valuations to increase fee income. In the established Canada vehicle, its governing agreement prohibits paying any person a fee calculated by reference to net asset value.

Fee preservation for independent asset managers

The fee structure of the Direct-Hold Solutions is designed so that the single fixed overhead contribution remains fully available to compensate the independent Asset Managers who orchestrate the external Special Purpose Vehicles through which international investors access the platform. Independent Asset Managers — fiduciaries engaged by international investors to manage their SPV participation — require compensation from the fee pool generated by the underlying assets. In a conventional 2/20 structure, the manager captures the majority of the fee income, leaving a reduced pool for Asset Managers acting on behalf of specific investor categories.

Preserved fee pool

The term "preserved fees" refers to the overhead contribution that is available to independent Asset Managers after the developer's fixed overhead cost is satisfied. Because the developer's compensation is taken as equity rather than as additional cash fees, the overhead contribution represents a smaller total fee extraction from the vehicle's income than a conventional management fee would represent. The preserved portion is deliberately retained as a resource for the independent managers who serve the international and institutional investor segments of the capital structure.

What this is not

No compensation under this model is currently being paid. No offering of units has closed, so no Equity-Based Compensation units have been issued, none are held in trust, and no Retained Equity exists on any vehicle's balance sheet. The annual overhead contribution and the one-time offering-cost reimbursement are provided for in the established Canada vehicle's governing agreement; neither has been triggered by a closed offering. The preserved fee pool for independent Asset Managers describes an intended allocation, not fees currently received by anyone. This article states the compensation structure the Direct-Hold Solutions are designed to apply as each vehicle is funded — not amounts paid, earned, or accrued to date.

Navigate

Topics

Resources

PointSav network