Professional Centres Mexico FIBRA — Direct-Hold Solution Structure
← All revisions
docs(entity-naming): retire WCP from investments/ body prose — Phase 4 batch 2
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ paired_with: professional-centres-mexico-fibra-structure.es.md cites: [] --- **Professional Centres Mexico FIBRA** is planned to issue CBFIs — trust participation certificates — in the operating Direct-Hold Solution vehicle described in the [[four-jurisdiction-framework|Four-Jurisdiction Framework]]; the vehicle is intended to be constituted as a Fideicomiso de Infraestructura en Bienes Raíces (FIBRA) domiciled in the State of Mexico. Woodfine Professional Centres 4 S.A. is planned as a wholly owned subsidiary of Woodfine Capital Projects Inc. (WCP), and is intended to serve as the trust's Administrator. WCP itself is intended to act as Promoter of the structure, mirroring its role in the established Canadian vehicle. This article covers the entities, agreements, and mechanics specific to this planned vehicle at the trust level — the Bank-fiduciary and Technical Committee governance split, the Subsidiary Silo liability model, Article 187/188 fiscal transparency, and how the Private FIBRA form compares with Mexico's FICAP and S.A.P.I. alternatives — rather than the corporate-parent structure or the multi-jurisdiction deployment architecture covered elsewhere. **Professional Centres Mexico FIBRA** is planned to issue CBFIs — trust participation certificates — in the operating Direct-Hold Solution vehicle described in the [[four-jurisdiction-framework|Four-Jurisdiction Framework]]; the vehicle is intended to be constituted as a Fideicomiso de Infraestructura en Bienes Raíces (FIBRA) domiciled in the State of Mexico. Woodfine Professional Centres 4 S.A. is planned as a wholly owned subsidiary of Woodfine Capital Projects Inc. ("Woodfine"), and is intended to serve as the trust's Administrator. Woodfine itself is intended to act as Promoter of the structure, mirroring its role in the established Canadian vehicle. This article covers the entities, agreements, and mechanics specific to this planned vehicle at the trust level — the Bank-fiduciary and Technical Committee governance split, the Subsidiary Silo liability model, Article 187/188 fiscal transparency, and how the Private FIBRA form compares with Mexico's FICAP and S.A.P.I. alternatives — rather than the corporate-parent structure or the multi-jurisdiction deployment architecture covered elsewhere. ## Key takeaways