Investment Vehicles

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ index_scope: investments
status: active
bcsc_class: public-disclosure-safe
language_protocol: PROSE-TOPIC
last_edited: 2026-08-27
last_edited: 2026-09-04
editor: woodfine-editorial
paired_with: _index.es.md
---
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ also compare the structure with joint ventures, private equity funds, and tradit

<!-- AUTO-GENERATED MEMBERSHIP: DO NOT EDIT BELOW — regenerate from index_group: the-direct-hold-structure -->
- [[direct-hold-framework]] — A legal structure that issues equity units in a single named direct-hold vehicle, not a share in a commingled pool, eliminating cross-asset contagion.
- [[investment-units]] — The equity units issued by each direct-hold vehicle in Woodfine's Direct-Hold framework.
- [[investment-units]] — The equity units issued by each direct-hold vehicle in Woodfine Capital Projects Inc.'s Direct-Hold framework.
- [[asset-vehicle-isolation]] — The legal and structural mechanisms through which each direct-hold solution is isolated as a separate vehicle: why creditors of one asset cannot reach assets held in another, and how this isolation protects unit holders.
- [[direct-hold-solutions-structural-comparison]] — Feature-by-feature comparison of the Direct-Hold Solutions with Legacy Joint Ventures, Private Equity funds, and Traditional REITs across twelve governance dimensions.
- [[titleco-and-subsidiary-silo-model]] — How each Direct-Hold Solution holds legal title to its real property: a separate Titleco subsidiary per building beneath the vehicle, the tax rationale behind Mexico's Subsidiary Silo structure, and the fee-capped third-party manager each Titleco retains.
@@ -55,9 +55,9 @@ and each vehicle's specific structure in turn.
<!-- AUTO-GENERATED MEMBERSHIP: DO NOT EDIT BELOW — regenerate from index_group: legal-form-and-jurisdiction -->
- [[limited-partnership-structure]] — How the limited partnership legal form implements the direct-hold investment structure: the GP-LP relationship, limited liability, unitholders as limited partners, and the partnership agreement as the governing instrument.
- [[four-jurisdiction-framework]] — Deployment framework for the Direct-Hold Solutions across Canada, the United States, Spain, and Mexico, each using the flow-through vehicle mandated by local securities law.
- [[professional-centres-canada-lp-structure]] — The legal and operating structure of Professional Centres Canada LP at the limited-partnership level — the advisory agreement, escrowed promoter equity, unit history, regulatory standing, and settlement mechanics — distinct from the corporate-parent and four-jurisdiction overview articles.
- [[professional-centres-canada-lp-structure]] — The legal and operating structure of Professional Centres Canada LP at the limited-partnership level — the advisory agreement, escrowed promoter equity, regulatory standing, and settlement mechanics — distinct from the corporate-parent and four-jurisdiction overview articles.
- [[professional-centres-spain-socimi-structure]] — The planned legal and operating structure of Professional Centres Spain SOCIMI at the vehicle level — the statutory listing mandate, the technical-listing mechanism, the Administrator role, and settlement arrangements — distinct from the corporate-parent and four-jurisdiction overview articles.
- [[professional-centres-mexico-fibra-structure]] — The planned legal and operating structure of Professional Centres Mexico FIBRA at the trust level — the Bank-fiduciary/Technical Committee governance split, the Subsidiary Silo liability model, Article 187/188 fiscal transparency, and the Private FIBRA vs. FICAP vs. S.A.P.I. comparison — distinct from the corporate-parent and four-jurisdiction overview articles.
- [[professional-centres-mexico-fibra-structure]] — The planned trust-level structure of Professional Centres Mexico FIBRA — the Bank-fiduciary/Technical Committee governance split, the Subsidiary Silo liability model, Article 187/188 LISR fiscal transparency, and how the Private FIBRA form compares with Mexico's FICAP and S.A.P.I. alternatives — distinct from the corporate-parent and four-jurisdiction overview articles.
<!-- END AUTO-GENERATED -->

## Investor Eligibility and Offering Exemptions
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ the accredited investor test in detail.

<!-- AUTO-GENERATED MEMBERSHIP: DO NOT EDIT BELOW — regenerate from index_group: investor-eligibility-and-offering-exemptions -->
- [[exemptions]] — Prospectus exemptions relied upon in each jurisdiction's offering: the accredited investor exemption and the parallel prospectus channel.
- [[accredited-investor-eligibility]] — The accredited investor exemption as a distribution channel for direct-hold limited partnership units.
- [[accredited-investor-eligibility]] — The accredited investor exemption under NI 45-106 as a distribution channel for units in the Canada and United States direct-hold limited partnerships alongside the prospectus offering: who qualifies, what the exemption permits, and the disclosure documentation required at the time of subscription.
<!-- END AUTO-GENERATED -->

## See also