Four-jurisdiction framework
fix(wiki): retire the fictional 'Universal Governing Bylaws' single-document framing across 4 articles (Track-B integrity review, operator-clarified) — the real underlying fact is that each Direct-Hold Solution has its own governing partnership/trust agreement, self-similar in substance across jurisdictions, not one unified document; reframed all 6 occurrences (four-jurisdiction-framework, direct-hold-solutions-structural-comparison x2, corporate-glossary's Qualified Investment entry, narrow-bank-financial-model) to 'each vehicle's own governing agreement'; dropped unconfirmed specific criteria names (co-location/Prototype/Campus Design) alongside the fictional document name; EN+ES
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ The target gross funded value is MN$5,000 million pesos. The Administrator is pl ## Self-Similar Governance Each of the four Direct-Hold Solutions applies Woodfine's Universal Governing Bylaws to its jurisdiction-specific vehicle structure. The result is Self-Similar Governance across all four jurisdictions: identical investment discipline, identical disclosure standards, and identical Freely Transferable Investment Unit mechanics, delivered through the legal form that each sovereign jurisdiction mandates. Each of the four Direct-Hold Solutions has its own governing partnership or trust agreement, specific to its jurisdiction's legal form. These agreements are self-similar in substance: the same investment discipline and the same Investment Unit mechanics, delivered through the legal form that each jurisdiction mandates. This approach eliminates the need for the investor to develop jurisdiction-specific investment frameworks for each of Canada, the United States, Spain, and Mexico. The governance characteristics of the Professional Centres Canada LP — continuous disclosure, audited financials, freely transferable units, exchange-qualified debt — are intended to be replicated in each of the three planned vehicles, subject only to the adjustments required by local securities law.